On 4/14/2014 11:57 AM, Thomas Charron wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Eric D <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I am confused as to how Chad is violating the GPL.
When Chad shares his kernel, he does in fact share source with the
same people who get the binary.
Oh come off it. Chad himself made the whole argument that he
doesn't have to provide sources to anyone including his own users with
the defence that they where all part of an 'organization' and due to
that, no sources where required as he was never distributing it.
Unless you're now calling Chad himself a liar.
NOW
if these others are sharing the binary without source (and yes,
this is happening) - this is NOT a violation on Chad, it is a
violation on the people sharing.
Step off. People have asked for the sources when this was NOT the
case, and the request was denied and ignored. Furthermore, it turned
into public rants about a super cool 'hole in the GPL'.
--
-- Thomas
While digging through these newest binaries, I found this:
..\m919-gpe-kk442-04052014_1826\system\lib\modules\anthrax_gpu_msm.ko
I'm guessing this contains Qualcomm code.
- Eric
