On 14-10-19 01:31 AM, lkcl . wrote:
[...]
nor do i have
the time to find and read the original sources that you've copied a
few sections from without providing references.
well, that's unfortunate, seeing as it was topic under discussion. In
any event, it was an interesting discussion. I still have no idea why
the FSF is on the side of Google for this, though. I say that because
I'd like to see the FSF directly, and publicly, address, if nothing else:
'Though the trial court did add the caveat that it “does not hold that
the structure, sequence and organization of all computer programs may be
stolen,” Copyrightability Decision, 872 F. Supp. 2d at 1002, it is hard
to see how its method of operation analysis could lead to any other
conclusion.'
page 42, appeals court decision
The FSF is ok with, in the words of not just the appeals court, but the
original trial judge, stealing the SSO of a computer program?
-Thufir
