On 21 Oct 2014, at 18:26, Robinson Tryon <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't get the point of discussing the linguistic intricacies at the > same time as discussing the legal points without pointing out up-front > that the word choice is likely to be viewed as inflammatory.
My recollection was that thufir did point out at the very beginning that s/he was using the words of the judgment, rather than his/her own choice of words: "It's remarkable that the trial judge and the appeal judge use a word like stolen, and not "infringe" or other legal mumbo jumbo." Best wishes Neil __________ Neil Brown [email protected] | http://neilzone.co.uk
