On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Kern Sibbald <[email protected]> wrote: > Your arguments are very interesting, but my experience is that FSF has very > well thought out and consistent positions, so I would like to abstain from > entering into this subject
that's a very well-thought out, concise, respectful, subtle and neutral response, kern. does anyone else have anything to add which will give thufir - and future readers of the gpl-violations archives now and in decades to come - some useful insight on the discussion and the conclusions reached here so far? i think that would be very helpful so please don't hold back. l.
