On 10/23/2014 08:29 PM, lkcl . wrote:
apologies to all on the gpl violations list for taking your time up
with this matter.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Thufir <[email protected]> wrote:
It's ok, Luke, I get it, you don't like my conclusions but can't be bothered
to read the appeal. No prob.
no - and, again, you have misunderstood. i am not sure if you are
deliberately misunderstanding or if your ability to assess english
language is genuinely as bad as it appears.
you have - in every single communication including the above which is
only one sentence - made assumptions and errors of judgement that make
it impossible to communicate effectively with you.
in the above simple sentence the key word is "like". you have
ASSUMED that i have assessed your "conclusions", have applied an
emotion to them instead of rational thought, and have acted purely on
base emotions instead of rational thought.
let me be absolutely clear: i have assessed your conclusions using
rational thought, not emotion. i have come to the rational conclusion
that you are at present incapable of rationally following or
contributing to the conversation. you have made too many logical
reasoning mistakes to make it possible for the average literate person
to have a conversation with you on this complex topic.
now, what _is_ useful is that you actually raised the question in the
first place, and have inspired many people here - through your
inabiity to reason - to think clearly and to write with additional
clarity about this complex topic. for that i am grateful and i am
sure that many others are as well.
however there comes a point where to continue to explain matters when
you have clearly demonstrated an inability to listen - not once but
repeatedly - and have clearly demonstrated an inability to think
logically and rationally, despite - and this is the scary bit - giving
the *appearance* to the contrary...
... there comes a point where it becomes necessary not for me to stop
interacting with you but also to advise people not to interact with
you either.
this is particularly difficult to assess because you genuinely have
some interest in the topic, are curious and inquisitive and that's
genuinely a good thing. however you DON'T LISTEN, and so you keep on
asking, overloading other people in the process.
i am endeavouring to be polite here and reason logically with you,
and provide you with some insight. if however you do not listen to my
advice i will be forced - with good reason - to be more blunt.
l.
Nice. Did you ever read the appeals court decision?
