Justin Dolske wrote: > Out of curiosity... > > I thought there were issues with trying to apply a software license to > creations which are not software? Not just images, but also things like > documentation (where a GFDL or CC license makes more sense).
It depends on the license. The GPL, for example, is written to be applicable to all sorts of creative work - although there are some it is better suited to than others. There is no legal reason why you can't apply any sort of copyright license to any creative work - it's just a question of how much legal confusion it causes. > Wasn't this also an issue for the infamous "add a better splash screen" > bug? I can't remember. You would need to remind us all of the relevant facts of the situation. Gerv _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal
