Axel Hecht wrote: > Hi, > > I just saw that the footer on sumo claims that the imported in-product > help pages would be under CC by-sa 3.0, which isn't true. They're really > under triple license, at least that's my reading from what we generally > say. > > Any ideas on how to remedy this?
I asked the very same question last week, and this is mconnor's response: "MPL tri-license by definition. Good point, since CC-by-SA 3.0 is also incompatible with our code licenses (which is why we don't use them for MDC etc). We probably should do some outreach to get people to agree. Probably can do a bit of bonsai scripting to get the list of individuals who've committed content. In the meantime, anything without relicensing permission should be labeled as trilicense for now. (FSF's copyright assignment makes this stuff so much easier.) Anything contributed by moco employees can be relicened in whatever way we see fit, since MoCo owns the copyright." _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal
