On 8/19/10 11:04 PM, Justin Dolske wrote:
On 8/19/10 11:16 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
My personal experience is that virtually no one reads documentation, so
that any requirements pertaining to documentation don't actually do much
to help give credit.
I pretty strongly agree with this. No one reads docs. And for a
project/software of any size, having license-required credits can
easily result in a wall of text, who wants to read that? Credits feel
like an issue orthogonal to core FOSS principles.
I still remember showing my grandmother that 'wall of text' the first
time I got in one, so I wouldn't discount it altogether. It is too easy
for those of us who are lucky enough to do this full time to forget the
impact of this kind of thing on volunteers.
It may be most productive to discuss what the outcome should be when a
healthy project (with presumably good contributor recognition practices)
is forked by a third party without a community connection. Think of the
license as a mandatory minimum, designed to cover that case, while the
best practices of healthy projects would go beyond that, but not be
mandated by the license.
Luis
--
Luis Villa, Mozilla Legal
work email: [email protected] (preferred)
work phone: 650-903-0800 x327
personal: http://tieguy.org/about/
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal
