We recently updated our license version page to identify more clearly the differences between license suites, fyi, for those of you interested.
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/License_versions Diane On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29/01/11 15:04, Ken Saunders wrote: >> >> This certainly isn't my area of expertise, but I noticed that the >> Creative Commons license referred to at >> http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/licensing/website-content.html is an >> Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0) one. >> At the bottom of that license's summary it notes, >> "A new version of this license is available. You should use it for new >> works, and you may want to relicense existing works under it. No works >> are automatically put under the new license, however." >> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ > > Hi Ken, > > Thanks for this. Yes, we could change the text, but I at least am not aware > of significant bugs in CC v2 which means we should stop using it. > > Gerv > _______________________________________________ > legal mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal > -- Diane M. Peters, General Counsel Creative Commons 171 Second St, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94105 office: +1 415-369-8480 fax: +1 415-278-9419 cell: +1 503-803-8338 skype: peterspdx email:[email protected] ______________________________________ Please note: the contents of this email are not intended to be legal advice nor should they be relied upon as, or represented to be legal advice. Creative Commons cannot and does not give legal advice. You need to assess the suitability of Creative Commons tools for your particular situation, which may include obtaining appropriate legal advice from a licensed attorney. _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal
