On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Robert Kaiser <[email protected]> wrote: > Josh Boyer schrieb: >> >> I was looking through the mozilla-central and mozilla-1.9.2 mercurial >> repos and noticed that there are a large number of files under the >> various tests directories that are licensed under the W3C license >> and/or the mochikit license. I tried to see if there was any history >> on when these were added, but it looks like the repo history ends at a >> CVS import. > > The history before this can be found in the CVS repository...
I'll figure out where that is. cvs.mozilla.org wasn't being friendly with me yesterday. >> Looking through the rest of the sources, I don't immediately see a >> copy of either of these licenses included. The >> toolkit/content/licenses.html file doesn't include them either. > > AFAIK, that file only includes licenses for code we ship, and from all I > know, the W3C and MochiKit licenses are only used on files we have for > automated tests, which are not part of shipped builds. They aren't part of shipped binaries from what I can tell, but when you go to ftp.mozilla.org and download e.g. the firefox-4.0.source. tar.bz2 tarball, the sources for the tests are included. There seems to be at least some manner of distribution taking place for those files. > I'll leave replies that have any legally substantial contents to those who > can give them, as I should be considered "just a community member" in this > regard, and of course, IANAL, etc. Understood. The same certainly goes for me as well :). josh _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal
