On 21/05/12 21:50, Axel Hecht wrote: > The example of libusb is interesting. I read that as: If a downstream > phone maker wanted to use b2g under the provisions of the mpl to bundle > it together with proprietory code under an EULA, they'd need to find a > replacement for that block of code?
No... why do you think that? Android comes with a EULA, but contains both GPL and LGPLed parts. Anyone distributing B2G already needs to be comfortable with both the GPL (for e.g. the Linux kernel) and (I believe; tell me if I'm wrong) the LGPL. Gerv _______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/legal
