Hallo Jason,
Some time ago (in September) one of the authors of the Eclipse plugin
sent an according posting to lejos' discussion list (see below).
Regards,
Matthias
--- Markus Heiden wrote ----
> Hi,
>
> I compiled the latest CVS version (1.2.0) of the LDT (leJOS development
> tools) and provided a test eclipse update site (currently windows
only!).
> Please check out:
>
> Name: LDT
> URL: http://www.markusheiden.de/ldt/update
>
> Add update site to Eclipse:
> "Help" -> "Software Updates" -> "Find and Install..."
> Select "Search for new features to install" -> "Next"
> "New Remote Site..." -> enter name and url -> "OK"
> Select "LDT" -> "Finish"
> continue to the end...
>
> Markus
>
Jason Q wrote:
I've never used the Eclipse plugin. Could you give me a link to it?
(and a link to download eclipse?)
-Jason
On 12/16/05, Matthias Paul Scholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My pleasure, Jason.
Did you happen to try the actual LDT (leJOS) plugin with Eclipse 3 also?
Would be interesting to have a comparison with the download times you
are facing with the (almost) actual cvs state of the download tools
(that the plugin uses).
Would be nice also to get your opinion regarding the advantages and
drawbacks in developing for leJOS with the Eclipse plugin compared to
doing so with the BlueJ plugin.
Regards,
Matthias
Jason Q wrote:
Thanks for the reply Matthias. I tried downloading the program from
the command shell, and it went at the same speed, so I guess I'm stuck
with this download speed. Well now I know that it wasn't BlueJ.
-Jason
On 12/16/05, Matthias Paul Scholz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hallo Jason,
The actual time needed for downloading will most likely depend on the
size of your program, in particular of the number of leJOS classes your
using (when running on leJOS 2.1.0 - the download time may prove to be
considerably shorter when using the actual cvs cut of leJOS where unused
class operations are omitted from the downloaded image).
However, I have no notion of eventual overhead of the BlueJ facilities
you mentioned - a good benchmark may be to download your program in a
"straight manner" (calling lejosdl directly - cf. the tutorial) and
compare it to the time you are facing with BlueJ.
Regards,
Matthias
Jason Q wrote:
I use the BlueJ plugin to compile and download programs to my RCX.
I've noticed that it takes a long time (close to a minute) just to
download the program. Is this time duration standard? Or is it
because I'm using the BlueJ plugin that it's slow? If so, does anyone
know of any faster compilers/downloaders I could use?
Thanks,
Jason
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Lejos-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lejos-discussion
