The Time Has Come To Say It Out Loud

 by John Gerassi

www.globalresearch.ca 17 June 2003

The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/GER306A.html
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------

 The time has come to say it out loud. Most of my academic
 colleagues say it privately, but hedge in their classes. Many of
 my old buddies at Time and Newsweek, where I was an editor for a
 decade, agree, but tell me they can never say so in print. All my
 friends fear that if they spell it out the FBI will arrest them in
 the middle of the night and they will become "disappeared" like
 hundreds of innocent Moslems who are not even charged with a
 crime. They know that Attorney General Ashcroft is itching to use
 the proposed Patriots' Act II, which will certainly become law
 after US forces suffer casualties in Iraq, to deport native-born
 critics of the Administration to Antarctica or bury them in
 solitary confinement in the Arizona desert, as that law permits.
 But it is now time to say and act upon the fact that the United
 States, as a state, is Fascist.

 We all know, and the media certainly can list the proofs, that
 those in power in Washington, Vice President Cheney, Secretary of
 Defense Rumsfeld, and his deputy Wolfowitz, among others, plotted
 the current anti-Iraq policy years ago. In 1992 they actually
 wrote it up in a letter to Bush I. Even Ted Koppel read parts of
 that 96-page letter on Nightline the other day, proving that Bush
 II's War has nothing to do with 9/11 or al Qaeda or terrorism. In
 fact, President Reagan removed Iraq from the list of states
 sponsoring terror back in l982.

 To those 1992 conspirators now making policy in the White House,
 adding up with Bush II as the world�s new and dreaded Gang of
 Four, the goal was and is control of the whole region. Not just to
 own the oil and gas, but also to control their sale, in order to
 dictate which developing country the US will help and which it
 will sink into desperate poverty. After Iraq, they want to invade
 Iran. Then any other country, especially the oil-rich "...stans"
 surrounding the Caspian Sea if they balk at US demands and where
 the US now has bases.

 No nation (certainly not Cuba) must be allowed to maintain an
 independent course, say the Gang of Four. The world�s worst
 dictators (in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Kuwait, Turkey, Kazakhstan et
 al) are acceptable if they trade by Washington�s rules. If not, a
 "regime change" is the next move. Bush II�s War on Iraq is only
 the beginning. It�s part of what in polite circles is called
 Globalization. In real terms its just plain Americanization.

 Most Americans support Bush II and his Gang of Four. So did the
 Germans support Hitler. He won over 60 percent of the vote in a
 fair election. He repeated ad nausea that it was the others� fault
 and the Germans believed him. It was the Czechs who stole the
 Sudetenland, he said. Repeat it often, Goebels advised him, and
 the world will believe it. And now, he would advise Bush II, say
 over and over that Saddam gassed his own people in the village of
 Halapja and the world will believe it, even if the CIA�s senior
 political analyst on Iraq at the time, who had access to the
 classified investigation of the incident, reported that it did not
 happen (NYT 10/31/03). The media said it did, without proof,
 almost every day since Bush said it during his State of the Union
 address. And again in his March 15 radio talk. Goebels would have
 been proud.

 Both the CIA and the FBI found no connection between Al Qaeda and
 Iraq. Bush II said there was one. He offered no proof. So what. He
 repeated it so often most Americans believe it. That's like when
 daddy Bush said that Saddam was going to attack Saudi Arabia after
 Kuwait. Totally absurd, and everyone in the media knew it. Saddam
 may be a scumbag but he isn't mad. But the media repeated it so
 often most Americans, who don't even know where Saudi Arabia is,
 believed it.

 To go against the Gang of Four is to be ostracized from
 Washington. The end of a Journalism Career. Notice Bush II�s last
 press conference. Only those reporters on his "goodie" list could
 ask him questions. Those who usually pose tough questions were
 silenced. CBS's veteran reporter-anchorman Dan Rather admitted in
 a BBC interview on his way back from Iraq that even he was
 intimidated by the Gang of Four: "It�s that fear that keeps
 journalists from asking the toughest of the tough questions."

 Who is really threatened by Saddam? Israel? Saddam knows very well
 that if he attacks it Iraq will be permanently exterminated. The
 American people? How absolutely ludicrous: his longest range
 missiles, which according to the UN inspectors violated the 93
 miles maximum by all of 30 miles, couldn't even reach the immense
 and oppressive US base on the Island of Diego Garcia in the Indian
 Ocean. So why do Americans support a bloodthirsty liar whose bombs
 kill children? Americans don't even know that the UN does not
 sanction the US/British bombing of Iraq's self-defense guns.

 The sanctions that the US did force the UN to adopt have already
 killed more than half a million Iraqi children, as reported by the
 UN and Bill Moyers on Public Television. But we know from the My
 Lai massacre that American soldiers are trained to view children
 of enemies, even tiny babies, equally as enemies, and kill them
 (raping the young girls first, of course).

 What has happened to the US when murderers and liars run our
 affairs and neither Congress nor ordinary Americans seem to care?
 Such Fascists as Elliot Abrams, guilty of lying to Congress and
 pardoned by Bush I (NYT 12,/07/02), member of the Israel lobby,
 now in charge of Palestine affairs at National Security; John
 Negroponte, who as US ambassador to Honduras during the Contra
 wars, helped Generals Alvarez, chief of Honduras' Armed Forces,
 and Luis Alonso Discua Elvir, head of Battalion 3-16, create the
 death squads responsible for the torture and murder or hundreds of
 men and women, including nuns opposed to the war, now US
 ambassador to the UN (LATimes 03/25/01; Sister Laetiti Bordes,
 s.h., 08/24/01); John Poindexter, former vice admiral convicted of
 five felonies of lying to Congress and obstruction of justice
 pardoned by Bush I, now in charge of the Pentagon�s electronic
 surveillance system which plans to spy on all Americans' banking,
 credit card, and travel t! transactions without a search warrant
 (NYT 11/10/02): Otto J. Reich, a Cuba-born anti-Castro fanatic
 whose office engaged in prohibited acts of propaganda (New Yorker,
 Oct. 14 & 21, 2002) and appears to want to execute anyone saying
 one word in favor of the Cuban revolution, now boss of all Latin
 American US diplomats; Gerald A Reynolds, a longtime foe of
 Affirmative Action, in charge of Bush II�s Office of Civil Rights
 (NYT 06/27/01); Harvey L. Pitt, a corporate lawyer who has
 represented the industries opposed to regulations by the SEC, to
 head the SEC; and on and on, plus all the disgustingly anti-poor,
 pro-big business lawyers being nominated by Bush II to judgeships
 around the country.

 But by far the most dangerous fascist in Bush II�s government is
 the man in charge of "justice", Attorney General John Ashcroft. A
 racist, fanatic fundamentalist, opposed to the civil and bodily
 (abortion) liberties upheld by the Constitution or the Supreme
 Court. Ashcroft is in favor of secret arrests, secret detentions,
 secret trials without appeals, secret verdicts and secret
 executions, all "odious to a democratic society" as Judge Arthur
 N. D�Italia of New Jersey's Superior Court said, when he ruled
 that secret detentions were illegal. Ashcroft not only appealed
 but ordered state and local governments to stop making public the
 names of those arrested (NYT 05/05/02).

 Like in Nazi Germany of yesterday, an innocent citizen who may or
 may not have mumbled some criticism of Ashcroft himself will
 suddenly disappear when out walking his dog, and his family will
 be allowed to go crazy trying to find out what happened.

 Will the innocent citizen then be tortured? Don't laugh: the US
 already uses torture. Now that the evidence is firm, the debate
 rages. Should we or should we not? And who decides? But in fact,
 the CIA has been torturing antis suspects for years, in Asia,
 Africa and especially Latin America. When I accompanied former
 Attorney General Ramose Clark to Teheran in l980, I saw a video's
 of CIA men, or Special Forces soldiers, sometimes in US uniform,
 showing SAVVY officers how to torture.

 I remember very vividly one horrifying case: a naked anti Shah
 Iranian hanging six inches off the floor by a chain around his
 wrists, which were bleeding, in the middle of what appeared to be
 a cement bunker. Two Iranians in civilian clothes were having
 difficulty forcing a cattle prod, which was wired to an electric
 generator, into the man's rectum, because his body kept swinging
 to and fro. An officer, obviously an American, in uniform but
 sporting no insignia, pushed the Iranians to the side, grabbed the
 prod with his right hand, held the prisoner with his left, and
 rammed the prod as far as he could, turning the Iranian toward the
 camera, and smiled as if to say "see! it's easy." Then, one of the
 officers of the SAVVY, which was created, financed and trained for
 the Shah by the CIA and Israel's secret service, the Moused,
 turned on the juice, and while the three men jokingly talked to
 the cameraman in this silent video, the hapless prisoner kept
 shaking wildly behind.! When the three turned back to him, he was
 dead.

 Not quite what the Washington Post reported on the front page of
 its December 26, 2002, issue, but what it did report about
 systematic torture at CIA and Special Forces centers was bad
 enough. Since then, the Nighties has been publishing other torture
 incidents, including the death of two old farmers tortured for
 having been forced to fight for Tailbone. Enough to make every
 American democrat ashamed. And agree with the chief of Egypt's
 Organization for Human Rights who said: "Torture demonstrates that
 the regime deserves destroying because it does not respect the
 dignity of the people." (The Nation, 03/31/03). Yes, it is the US
 which needs a regime change -- before we all become either Gestapo
 informers or actual goons, or end up rotting in jail.

 So who benefits from all this repression at home, torture,
 destruction and killing of children overseas? Not you or me, not
 us ordinary Joe and Jane. But the rich, those who profit from
 controlling world trade, the CEO's of the multi-national
 corporations, like Goodyear, Texaco, Colgate-Palmolive, WorldCom,
 which earned more than $12 billion in l996-98 but instead of
 paying taxes got $535 million in credit and refunds, or General
 Electric, IBM, Intel, and so many others which paid almost no
 taxes (NYT 10/20/00), while their CEOs gave themselves such huge
 bonuses that, combined, they could have built a modest home
 stocked with a year's worth of healthy food for every poor person
 in the Third World. In 1997, Occidental Petroleum lost $390
 million, but CEO Ray Iron gave himself a $100 bonus. Sangfroid
 Wile, CEO of Travelers upped him quite a bit, with $230 million.
 Bill Gates' new mansion cost $53.4 million, more than the budget
 of 72 countries of the world. In 2000, the rat! io of the average
 salary of a Japanese CEO to that of a Japanese blue-collar worker
 was 11 to 1; in the US it was 476 to 1 (Time, 04/24/00). Today the
 US figures are up another third. Obscene, isn't it? So which
 country really needs a regime change?

 The Gang of Four are dedicated to these greedy bloodsuckers. They
 will continue to lie, torture and kill for their patrons. As
 Hitler would have said: Iraq today, the world tomorrow. It is time
 to stop them. Or to try, anyway. Like the German Catholic
 underground. They risked their lives, and most did indeed lose
 them, because they knew in their souls that to conquer the world
 is more than a sin; it is the establishment of evil on earth.

 In Germany the goal was power. In the US the goal is mostly money.
 The result is the same, and the leaders of this country should be
 tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity, just as they
 were in Germany. That's why US leaders, who voted for the creation
 of a War Crimes Tribunal, want Americans to be immune from the
 court's prosecutors. Understandably, since some of worst crimes
 against humanity were perpetrated by former Defense Secretary
 Robert McNamara, Reagan's team with its decision to assassinate
 teachers, doctors, nurses and agricultural workers in order to
 bring down the government of Nicaragua which had been fairly
 elected after the revolution, by all of Nixon�s top staff, and
 especially by America's No.1 political gangster, Henry Kissinger
 who is responsible for the murder of 30,000 Chileans.

 American law gives each of us the right to make a citizen's arrest
 when we see a criminal in action. The Gang of Four are such
 criminals. Let's stop them. We tried and did fairly well during
 the Vietnam War. The Gang of Four are tougher; unlike President
 Johnson they have no human conscience. So it will be harder. But
 you can do it.

 I say "you" because if this is printed I will surely be arrested
 and deported to some Arizona desert cave by Ashcroft's criminal
 organization known as the FBI. Or beaten to death by some American
 "patriotic" yokel.

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Copyright John Gerassi 2003. For fair use only/ pour usage *quitable
seulement .


-------------------------------------------
Macdonald Stainsby
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international
--
In the contradiction lies the hope.
                                     --Bertholt Brecht




_______________________________________________
Leninist-International mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/leninist-international

Reply via email to