On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, 17:35 Roman Lebedev, <lebedev...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Why not just profile the camera/lens as usual?


> It will likely require same level of effort (or less, given that the
> procedure is known),
> and will likely produce better results yet.


I thought it will be easier as I basically have the same image one time
distorted and the other corrected, vs trying to figure out the distortion
by considering straight lines.
Also, I'm guessing Canon already did a good job calibrating the lenses as
they had access for the exact optical specifications. On the other hand,
the normal way to calibrate would be empirical and depend to a great extent
on the quality of my calibration shots, which I guess would not be perfect.

Thanks,
Guy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Lensfun-users mailing list
Lensfun-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lensfun-users

Reply via email to