On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:24 AM, thyrsus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The @settings trees themselves will be small, but the tree in which > they are (potentially) embedded is large. So let me change my > proposal: could we change from c.allNodes_iter to > c.all_positions_with_unique_tnodes_iter to find the @settings node?
No problem. I believe the docs say that only the first @setting node has effect. Regardless of the docs, that is what happens. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
