A comment on the term "icon". Really to be clear we need to say "user-icon" or "status-icon". The status icon being the content/clone/dirty/marked indicator that Leo's had for much longer than it's had user-icons.
The rclickicon hook currently only runs off the status-icon, I don't think any hooks use the user-icons. So bobjack's changes might make things more flexible in that regard. I think the status-icon deserves a, um, special status, the information it conveys is important, and bear in mind that other interfaces might convey it in other ways. So maybe bobjack's high level container thing should have status.marked, status.dirty, etc. attributes/methods, and while the Tk interface uses an icon to show those, another interface might not. Cheers -Terry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
