On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Here's a stopgap measure to survive 2 people editing the same .leo
> > file, with very little coding
>
> I'm not sure I understand the problem you are trying to solve.

Two people editing the same .leo file in network share. There is no
version control system involved.

> bzr will warn about conflicts in .leo files.  In a collaborative
> environment, all data should be in thin derived files.  The "reference" .leo

That's too much overhead for an outline/mindmap/whatever. This is not
really about programming tasks.

> files hardly ever change, the corresponding local .leo files can have
> whatever people want.

Yeah, but here the reference leo file is all there is.

> Perhaps more importantly, Leo's compare-leo-outlines command was designed to
> handle cvs conflicts.  It compares the present outline with another, and
> creates clones of all inserted, deleted and changed nodes.  Might this be a
> good starting point for you?

Yes, sounds like it.

-- 
Ville M. Vainio - vivainio.googlepages.com
blog=360.yahoo.com/villevainio - g[mail | talk]='vivainio'

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to