On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aside: the present position is represented by a series of child > indices, like 0.3.4. This scheme is unaffected by this discussion. Why not use gnx's as indices? gnx1.gnx2.gnx3. It would only malfunction when a tnode is cloned in a sibling node, and has a better chance of surviving when you update a .leo file from version control. -- Ville M. Vainio - vivainio.googlepages.com blog=360.yahoo.com/villevainio - g[mail | talk]='vivainio' --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
