On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Kent Tenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> The solution of removing all the settings from various files detracts >> considerably from the power offered by the settings flexibility. > > I agree. The print-bindings (or a new print-settings) command should a > least tell where each binding comes from. >> >> Is a config restructuring which cleanly cascades on a todo list somewhere? >> (I know this has come up before, I can't remember how it ended up, sorry) > > It may be on the list, but given the success with new key bindings w/o > changing the settings code I'm not sure anything new with settings is ever > going to happen. The problem is that I just don't understand how to handle > trees of bindings. I think Terry Brown may want to do something about > this. I tried to discourage him, but he persisted :-)
OK, I guess I'm in the same boat as Terry, it won't be easy for me to let go of this. I'll look at the source and see if I can get a sense of how this stuff works. Thanks, Kent > > Edward > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
