On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Additionally, I think the performance of pyrex would be worse than the >> mxtexttools >> approach. > > I find this statement hard to believe. How can mxTextTools do the > code generation part? What do you mean by code generation? As I understand it, mxtexttools is just a set of rules that would be executed completely inside C extension without "popping back" to python in between. It's optimized for this kind of task, and probably has a streamlined implementation. Of course the only way to know for sure is to try it out... -- Ville M. Vainio - vivainio.googlepages.com blog=360.yahoo.com/villevainio - g[mail | talk]='vivainio' --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
