On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:42:30 -0700 (PDT) TL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What limitations would you put on the node's that could be > simultaneously selected? None... which is already the case with nodes that can be simultaneously marked, of course. > Would they all have to have a common parent > node? If not, what would Leo do with a paste of nodes from different > parents? Well, Paste's probably no big deal because it would just be a matter of making a copy of each of the selected nodes at the target point. Of course clones will find a way of making that more complicated, that's their job :-) But Move would be trickier of course, given the rules about not being your own ancestor. So I guess the polite way would be to attempt to move all the nodes selected to the target position, and if it fails, abort and do nothing. Rather than try and work out if a move is valid before hand it might be easier to save an undo point (should do that anyway), then just back up to it if something goes wrong. Seem reasonable? Cheers -Terry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-editor@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
