On Wednesday 20 August 2008 12:16 pm, Edward K. Ream wrote: > On Aug 20, 10:31 am, Randy Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 1. Everyone seems agree that the following structure for settings > > ^Almost > > True, brevity is a virtue, but this is too brief. If you have > objections please state them clearly.
Sorry! I stated (or implied / tried to state) my concerns in an earlier post, those being: * consider the XDG Base Directory Specification (http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-0.6.html) * keep the locations configurable (so that real user data and configuration data can be separated sometime in the future) The approach you are headed towards is pretty much the current standard Linux approach, so how can I argue that it is not appropriate. I am tilting at windmills advocating for what I think is a better approach, one which I think will come to pass sooner or later. So, I had trouble allowing myself to be grouped with the "Everyone" that "seems to agree", and I'm just stating that I don't--but not expecting any change based on my lack of agreement. Hmm, it seems like I could have said this more simply and clearer, and Im just making noise. Sorry about that. regards, Randy Kramer -- "I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I created a video instead."--with apologies to Cicero, et.al. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
