On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:19 AM, TL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Edward, I suggest you take a look at the documentation, especially the Open > Issues section in the "Vim Developers Documentation" node. The issues are > architectural in nature except those grouped under the "Functions missing or > require changes" subsection.
I just took a brief look at this long list. You've done good work in highlighting the required features. > The issues that can be addressed by a new or modified Leo function should be straight forward to implement with only a minor risk of side effects. I should be able to do these as time permits. Thanks for this offer. > The architectural changes should be implemented by you. To reduce rework, I > suggest you work with me to detail the needed functionality before you start > designing and implementing them. I'm not sure when I'll get around to this. I usually like to work one one major project at a time. But if you're willing to wait I'll get around to it eventually. OTOH, I would encourage you to start a new branch for "architectural" changes. I'll be willing to answer questions and provide hints for how to proceed. Indeed, for this kind of work, I would most likely do something like the "naive" patch for the Meta key. The code is too complex for *anyone* (including me) to understand in such a way that the way forward is clear. Instead, I would put in traces and go from there. So I would encourage you to dive in and see what happens. That's what I would do :-) Don't let your supposed "lack of understanding" get in the way. I don't have that kind of understanding either. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
