On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Edward K. Ream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a minor, probably premature, optimization. It may be worth > doing, or not, but it affects the essential design not at all. The > size of the file cache should never be an issue in these days of > gigantic hard disks. Actually, if we pay some attention to discarding old cache files (e.g. by "remembering" the checksums we used to read from, and noticing when the checksum for that file changes), we can indeed dump the whole file. This will allow us to also skip utf8 decoding as well ;-) I still think storing byte offsets is the right way to go, but that optimization can be done later. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
