On Nov 4, 1:01 pm, "Edward K. Ream" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Actually, if we leave out the filename, we can also reuse the cache
> > even when the user does file renaming (same content => same resulting
> > nodes). We don't need to be cryptogrophically secure here.
>
> > Though this is turning a bit academic, and such details can be ignored
> > for now...
>
> I agree. My thought was that the filename might be a debugging aid.
An alternative would be to put debugging info into the cache file
itself. Your choice.
Edward
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
