On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, this may no be needed at all - it may be just a > matter of optimizing a few bits here and there. Hopefully this is the > case :-). And, after a bit of profiling, this seems to be the case (joy!). The performance problems are not because the fundamental approach needs to be rethought - they happen because there are still performance bugs in the code. That is, incremental improvement will get us to great speed in no time... -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
