On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Jesse Aldridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> It would seem natural for Simonyi and I get in contact.
>
> That could be really cool.  He's a billionaire capitalist though...
> not sure how interested he would be in some semi-obscure open source
> project. :)

In my experience, CEO's are often generous with their time.

Furthermore, Leo may offer something to Simonyi's project.

My brain is on fire with ideas stimulated by Simony's ideas:

- Leo should have graph and spreadsheet views of nodes.  These would
cover all the significant possibilities for representing data in two
dimensions.

- A thought: the "third dimension" of a Leo outline could be called
computation, inference, meaning or understanding.  That is, a Leo
outline shows arbitrarily many *visual* dimensions, but "animating"
outlines is a truly new direction/dimension.

- Simonyi probably doesn't understand at present how powerful Leo's
data model is.  It would add something to his projects.

- Simonyi's emphasis on "identity" is intriguing.  If makes refactoring trivial.

I could go on and on.  There are major areas of congruence between our
thinking.  I'll be reading as many papers as I can, starting with
http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/languageWorkbench.html  I am
feeling the same sense of exhilaration, confusion and possibilities
that I felt way back in 1995.

Simonyi is challenging me to re-vision Leo, and my competitive juices
are flowing.  My feeling is that Leo outlines and Python may be a
better foundation to build on than xml databases and lisp. Having said
that, Simonyi has a big head start, and I'll learn much from him.

Edward

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to