On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Terry Brown <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Ok - but assuming the code works for top level positions (it should, > right?) it still doesn't make sense to pop from an empty list and raise > an exception. Oops. You are right. I just tested this and got a complaint that v.parents doesn't exist. So obviously the code is completely untested. I see where the confusion lies. There are unit tests for item2position and position2item in the Qt gui, but of course they are irrelevant. I was confusing these tests with the test for c.vnode2position. But there is no such test. Sorry about that. Let me fix this on the trunk. I should be able to do so today. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
