On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> Qt 4.5 probably has better support for QScintilla, which conceivably may be > useful down the road. However, having put so much effort into using > QSyntaxHighlighter, this has little appeal. I agree. Scintilla would have been "fast route" to some functionality (i.e. we would have got editing functionality like syntax highlighting for free - but not in "leo way", so that e.g. docparts would have worked). QTextEdit is what will benefit the most from updates to Qt, performance & API-wise. Scintilla is a separate project from Qt, even if PyQt does ship with QScintilla. I also believe we will see performance improvements to QTreeWidget, as well as overall rendering speed improvements (esp. on Linux) - not that I have noted any problems in rendering speed as such. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
