On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW, an unrelated thought - maybe select_b may not have the most > intuitive behaviour right now, since it looks at the *direct children* > of the nodes in poslist (just like select_h). Perhaps it should just > scan the nodes in current poslist, filtering out the nodes that don't > match. There is also an annoying logical glitch - select_h is "one step too far" in traversal, which will surely trip people expecting precise selection of one node, as opposed to its children. Stay tuned, and don't try it yet ;-). -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
