On Mar 11, 10:07 am, tfer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 11, 9:00 am, TL <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I assume all of the sub-nodes were also copied over.
>
> yes
>
> > Is it possible that another node exists after the "@key Vim bindings"
> > node that is redefining key bindings?
>
> don't remember any, I check when back at that machine tonight.
moved @keys vim below all key binding nodes, no change.
>
> > When I issue the command, the "Command" tab card displays a list of
> > 786 key bindings but the top most lines indicate that there are
> > bindings above it that have been dumped from the buffer. I suspect
> > the other set-command-state bindings are part of that dumped text.
> > Are you seeing the same thing?
>
> I don't think so, check this later also.
no, don't see this, commands are list alphabetically anyway so cuts
would start chopping out A's.
I should mention that I'm always running the latest via bazaar.
Since no one else is chiming in on this, I'm probably going to give up
on it for a while.
Tom
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
