On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Perhaps it should be put back in to arg list and just ignored. OTOH, I > >> think it should still be available (in the API) and honored as well, > >> even if there is no user-visible setting for doing that. > > > > Hmm. What you say is reasonable, but didn't you say earlier that this > kind > > of setting should be avoided? > > Setting, yes, API feature, no. It still makes sense to have that kind > of flag in the API. How about this compromise? I'll leave the present code unchanged, thereby removing the arg from the API. I'll put breadcrumbs in the code telling how to put the arg back in if somebody really wants it. In other words, I'd like to kill the argument, but I would like to save myself some work if that turns out not to be a good idea in practice. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
