On Mar 25, 5:17 pm, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: > People want all of Leo's advantages without Leo.
I see this differently. I want the advantages of leo, but I have the feeling that leo is enforcing something. This is *my* problem, not a drawback of leo. I do admit that it's because I don't know leo very well, that's why I've raised this question. The same thing happened when I was complaining about @test nodes some time ago and you added 'self' as a new feature, so assertEqual() and assertRaises() methods of unittest.TestCase were made available in @test nodes. I was happy with this and leo gained a new cool (you admitted it yourself) feature. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
