On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW, 100% of the time will always be used by some process. The "system > idle" process usually soaks up the slack. The issue is not really whether The advantage with idle process is that it saves the cpu (and as such, in case of laptop, battery power). Essentially, having a "busy" idle handler will keep the CPU warm and soak up the battery faster than, say, playing a demanding 3d game. > Any other comments or ideas? Perhaps the idle time handler should use a nonzero timeout (say, one second?). -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
