Ville M. Vainio wrote:
> I'm willing to put in some work into making Leo end up in Debian (and
> as a consequence, Ubuntu). It will mean more users (because people
> find projects by browsing whats available in package repos), but I
> think Leo may be ready for that - with the Qt gui, we shouldn't get
> that many complaints about antiquated UI appearance, though general
> flow of newbie questions and complaints (and praise!) will be
> inevitable.
>
> Here's what needs to happen next:
>   
[...]
> - Need to go through the debian bureaucracy (file Intention To
> Package, ask someone to mentor/sponser etc.). I'm not yet sure whether
> this is easier for debian or ubuntu.
>   


This is the most frustrating part. Leo is in the repositories of Arch 
Linux already. No bureaucracy here. And is really simply to create a 
recipe for making the last bzr snapshot available for the Arch community.

I know this is an old post, but I want to add more joy in my reading 
just pointing differences like that (but I don't want to start a holly 
war about my distro is better than yours)

Cheers,

Offray

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"leo-editor" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to