On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:31 AM, TL <[email protected]> wrote: > > It would be nice to have support for the @ignore directive within > @thin sub-nodes. Is there a problem with having Leo store the @ignore > node in the @thin file with its body text commented out just like a > programmer might comment out a block of their code?
There is a fatal problem with this idea: it makes no sense whatever. The problem is that @thin gets *all* of its essential information from the external file. So the @ignored stuff would be gone for good. Sure, you could place the @ignored stuff in a uA in the root @thin node, but that's too ugly. And it's far from a good idea. Besides, there are many obvious workarounds. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
