On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Edward K. Ream<[email protected]> wrote:
> I can't help feeling there is something fishy here. Unicode takes an > optional encoding argument, and that argument makes no sense if QString > represents a unicode object. Yes, it doesn't make any sense. My guess is that it's silently discarded when presented with QString. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
