> > > Is this a feature or a bug? If it's a feature, what's the reason or > > benefit? > > I don't remember the details, but I suspect there are substantial > difficulties in the read logic. > > There may also be data consistency issues: if you change one copy of the > supposedly cloned data, Leo will have no good way of guessing which version > it is supposed to use. > > Just say no to clones in @thin trees, at least until after Leo 4.6 final :-) > > Edward
That makes sense if one were to change the data in the derived file outside of Leo. Rob............ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
