On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Signing leo docs with gpg could be a decent cop-out... I suppose. It wouldn't help with a malicious bzr poster. Or implementing a dumb "leo viewer" that parsed the sax, read in the > external files, and did nothing more. Not a terrible idea, but then the problem becomes, how does one guarantee that one has an "authentic" copy of the viewer. Imo, internet security is pretty much an oxymoron until such time as we can verify that content comes from a trusted source. There was an excellent google talk about that subject... Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
