On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I in the process of merging the one-node branch into the trunk by hand. > This involves a lot of careful attention to diffs, but the process is > converging to what looks right. All unit tests pass with g.unified_nodes = > False, and I'm about to run them with g.unified_nodes = True. > Rev 2350 of the trunk contains the merger of the one-node branch into the trunk. At present, the code runs with g.unified_nodes = False, which means that the code should be functionally identical to what we had to before. I have carefully checked the diffs to ensure that no unexpected reversion took place. All unit tests pass regardless of the value of g.unified_nodes. Please report anything strange immediately. A good next step will be to diff the trunk with the 46-maint branch. Naturally, we expect differences, but we also expect some similarities :-) My apologies for all this excitement. It's not at all what I expected. However, I think we can be fairly sure that the merge has actually gone well. Whether the new one-node code actually works is a different matter: I'll be testing that in the next few days... Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
