On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 1. Position generators are the base of the scheme. For example, here > > is a partially tested rewrite of c.allNodes_iter, called, much more > > properly, allPositions(). These functions will eventually become > > Could we have more pythonic & shorter names for these methods that > don't use camelCase? Something like c.walk() and c.walknodes() > I agree, it would be good to shorten and clarify names. The names of some of the new "unique" iterators are way too long. Let me think about a scheme that will be relatively consistent across all iterators. I would like to get rid of the _iter suffix, but it's not clear that can be done cleanly. As for camelCase, I usually prefer xY to x_y, but not always, and Leo uses both without much plan. That's not likely to change, absent a safe script for making the changes. Edward --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
