On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks. I've even considered caching marks and expansion bits. Any >> non-critical info is a candidate for caching. > > Marks should be in the .leo file IMO. > > Expansion bits, definitely cache them.
Interesting distinction. I've been wondering about cost on the disk. Each separate category of cached data requires a separate file, for each cached file. Is anyone going object to all these little files? Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
