> That's probably true, but I don't recommend saving clones in multiple > n...@all external files.
Indeed, currently Leo does not support well the case of "multi source clone". Wouldn't we like to improve this? > In other words, Imo, the most important distinction is between > external files containing @all and external files that don't. > > My suggested rule is this: when putting clones in external files, make > sure the clone appears in at most one external file that does not > contain an @all directive. > > Leo's new read code gives top priority to clones in external files not > containing @all. The new read code gives lowest priority to clones in > external files that do contain @all. I have referred to this in a reply above. I find this logic very confusing and use case specific. Gil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
