On Jan 30, 1:12 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Gil Shwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think that the type of clone is a property of the clone entity (I am > > not sure what the standard terminology is, but I am referring to what > > is represented by <t> element in the .leo file, and by "Hidden Root > > Node" in a previous comment of Edward). > > Again, this is a major disagreement between us. What you are calling > the "clone entity" is, it seems to me, the same thing as the entire > Leo outline (the entire .leo file). I don't want any such > outline-wide data dependencies influencing clones!!!!
I admit that maybe your terminology confused me. I assumed there are many "Hidden Root Nodes", and root is used in the sense of clone root, not the entire Leo tree root. I am not too familiar with Leo's internal, but I do remember a long time ago, a separation between the tree structure (tree nodes, including clone nodes) and the collection of nodes content designated by GNXs. This suggests that for a clone, multiple clone nodes just point to a single node content (which is what I refer to a clone entity, and which may include sub-nodes). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
