On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote:
> But again, I don't think all of this is a big deal, and nobody would > notice the difference :-). It might just make the code more > complicated. I shall do nothing further before Leo 4.7 final. But there are problems that I would like to fix early in the 4.8 release cycle: 1. Memory does leak, and that's not ok with me. And I want just two files per top-level directory. 2. Strange things can happen with caching, as just happened to me when I restored qtui_generate.py mistakenly deleted from leo/test. There is an @auto node for this file in qtGui.py, and I got improper 'can not open' messages for this file. 3. It is troubling that the present caching scheme does not use the full path to a file, only the basename. This means that two identical files in two different places will use the same cache entries. I've been wondering for the last several days about whether this could cause problems. I don't know for sure, but I am uncomfortable. 4. I want the clear-cache and clear-all-caches commands to do what they say: get rid of everything. Among other things, this is good for debugging and recovering from cache problems. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
