On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Edward K. Ream <edream...@gmail.com> wrote: > Leo 4.7.1 will indeed be needed to fix a bug that can (will) cause > data loss in the conversion of @file nodes to the new (thin-like) > sentinels.
I am planning to base 4.7.1 on rev 3002 of the trunk. The alternative would be to backport the present bug fix to a branch based on rev 2987. But that would be a lot of work to back out of real bug fixes. Alas, there is the matter of rev 2999 to consider. It is a mass "cleaning" of files. Here is the checkin log: pep 8 work. What a great way to waste time and insert bugs. pep 8 is actively evil unless there are reliable automatic tools in place. Yes, I did check the diffs, but as I said somewhere else, these kinds of changes are the very essence of stupidity. It would be good (essential) to have a tool to verify all the diffs of that rev affect only blanks lines or comments. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to leo-edi...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
