On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:54:50 +0200 "Ville M. Vainio" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know if I'm overengineering here, but perhaps: > > - List of provided commands (or command pattern, e.g active-path-*) > - Introduced semantic tags (@bookmark...) I think those would be easy to handle if present. So, really impressed with how easily my first draft of 'plugin_catalog.py' could pull all the docstrings into one big rst file. Seems that there's just one docstring fouling things up... and that would be the docstring from 'plugin_catalog.py'. Gah. I don't think it likes :these_things: below the top level. Part from that, treating all plugin docstrings as rst, there seem to only be about 30 "errors", i.e. text which isn't valid rst. Not bad. Cheers -Terry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
