On Mar 2, 9:01 am, "Edward K. Ream" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The image that comes to mind are all the damned calls to isinstance in > pylint. These calls are intended to discover the *syntactic* > structure of the code. This simply can *not* be the proper design of > one of Python's most important tools. Instead, we want the inferences > to be driven by the semantic tables. This will be simpler, faster and > *much* more flexible and powerful. Even in pep8 itself, this distinction is important. Note how update_symbol_table knows nothing about syntax. This is the kind of code that we should be seeing in pylint. It is this kind of code that makes a difference. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
