On Mar 24, 12:07 am, June Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > As I embarked on the journey of learning and using Leo, it constantly > reminded me of Engelbart's NLS[1]. [] > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLS_%28computer_system%29 > > Were orginators of Leo aware of NLS, and did they take any concepts from it? > Did they see any connections? Are they planning to extend Leo with NLS > features? Where is Leo heading?
there are no doubt thousands of projects seemingly converging on the theory of everything. many predating the web. thanks for posting the link. I've been studying the classic diff algorithms the past week for a html tidy front end in euqt and ran into this, yet another project I'de never heard of. this one seems to have helped define the term "vaporware". revision control control is not yet a solved problem. there is still room for improvements in the user interface for sure. on just a quick read, they were attempting to build an RCS into the editor. now there are so many competing products it would seem to be impractical to limit an editor this way. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Xanadu http://xanarama.net/ http://xanadu.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
