On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Gour <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 08:28:41 -0500 >>>>>>>> "Edward" == "Edward K. Ream" wrote: >> >> Edward> As I reread this remark, I realize that it appears to single >> Edward> out Knuth for criticism. That was not my intent. My apologies >> Edward> to him. >> >> Here is some interesting thread about Leo/LP... >> >> Otoh, someone in the thread mentioned Org-babel which might be >> enlightening as well. (http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/) > > It looks interesting. I'll study it closely.
I haven't studied org-babel in detail, but it appears that they have discovered the benefits of higher-level data, represented by what can only be called lightweight sentinels. If they used gnx's in the sentinels, they could represent clones :-) I often wonder what Leo would have looked like had I been an emacs programmer from the start... Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
